IM Risks: "Victoria's" Dirty Little SecretComments (0)
It was a prank described
as one that "straddles
the fuzzy gray line between "Crap-Yer-Pants Hilarious" and "Inexcusably
Cruel"." Either way, it was a prank that was so effective that
it probably makes the
'Cameron ...
Read More . . .
From Nancy Flynn of the ePolicy Institute
in Columbus, Ohio:
"HAVE YOU BEEN FIRED VIA E-MAIL
OR IM?
If so, National Public Radio (NPR) would like to talk with you. Frank Langfitt,
Labor/Workplace Correspondent for National Public Radio (NPR) ...
Read More . . .
Via Michael
Sampson of Shared
Spaces Research and Consulting,
I read a press release from Akonix
and The ePolicy
Institute that discusses the
lack of preparedness of organizations when it comes to Instant
Messaging (IM) policies. Of nearly
300 ...
Read More . . .
US Banks, which are overseen by the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) will from time to time receive
guidance in the form of "Financial Institution Letters". In 2004,
they received FIL-84-2004, "Guidance on Instant ...
Read More . . .
This past Saturday, I wrote about the
problems
faced by AOL Instant Messenger users
when close to 10,000 active users were accidentally deleted. Stephen O'Grady
thought I was a bit harsh in my view that companies deserved "what
they got" if ...
Read More . . .
Instant Messaging: AOL Embarrassment Perfect Example of Why Business Should Not Rely on Public Networks
The story is simple. AOL was
trying to purge old unused AOL Instant Messenger (AIM) accounts.
In the process, they inadvertently blocked access to up to 10,000 active
users. To make matters worse, no explanation was posted by AOL. Talk about
a double ...
Read More . . .
Via Ed
Brill, there is a story published
in Risk and Insurance, a trade journal for the insurance industry,
entitled "Instant
Upside, Instant Downside".
This article gives good insight at a high level about business control
and corporate ...
Read More . . .
